Islam .. The Nazis of our time?

We must learn from history.. We forget at our peril. 

A subject which keeps recurring on "Stang's View", is that of the dangers of giving the Muslim religion the benefit of the doubt, and believing that most practitioners are benign or moderate. It was evident by the actions of the so called "Moderates" during the Sydney riots last year, that there is a cancer in their religion that compels them to believe that they can trample the rights of anyone who is not of their faith, and that the rest of us must yield or face their wrath. Their is a real and present danger in the world from this religion, and I couldn't explain it any better than the author of this article that was emailed to me recently. Tell me what you think.

A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people..

The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'?

History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?) The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.

In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem, just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s shores.

In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.

As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts -- the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Gay Marriage Debate

How do we discern what is main stream and what is deviant behaviour?

Over the centuries man's natural instincts and desires have been governed and tempered by our moral compass, a compass which has largely been set by what "civilised" society has deemed proper; overriding, in many cases, the natural instincts of man.

It wasn't long ago, a hundred years or so actually, that it was acceptable for young girls to be married off to older men when they were 12 years old and a few centuries ago in some eastern cultures even younger.

If this happened today in Australia, the man would be jailed for statutory rape and seen as a pariah in society. Although, in nature, the female would be deemed to be sexually productive and the male to be following his natural reproductive instinct. However, through the same processes that banned slavery, gave people equal rites, gave women the vote etc., our society has changed and "decency" has given us a new set of values. Among those values is the sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman and bringing up children in that sacred environment so that the natural order is preserved.

If Gays wish to have a legally binding civil partnership, then call it that. Call it a Gay Relationship like a De-facto Relationship. Give it all the legal trimmings and leave it at that. Most people don't object to the relationship being recognised, but they object to it being deemed "Normal" by the word "Marriage". Shit, some people are just getting over the "De-facto" thing and that's actually a natural relationship between a man and a woman.

Now to the gay thing in general, which leads to the resistance to gay "marriage".

If you held a vote today most would vote to let gay marriage go ahead. However this would be an empathy vote. most would say "Yeah, let them do what they want, just not around me".

Let's be clear, let's not confuse love with sex. Men and women love brothers, sisters, friends, of the same sex but they don't want to marry them or have sex with them. Marriage is about sex and having children, however in the case of Gays, one is not natural and the other is not possible.

I don't care what sexual urges people have as long as they keep them between themselves. It's confronting enough if you are surprised by two heteros carousing in public, let alone two gay guys going at it in the street.

Lets face it, homosexuality is not natural no matter how you want to wrap it. Neither are some sexually deviant acts between heterosexual partners, but then again these practitioners are not trying to mainstream it.

 What's Sydney's Gay Mardi Gras about? Gay rights? Advertising a diviant lifestyle? or raising tourist dollars? I think it started out as a gay rights thing, but now sadly it is about the latter two goals.

The jury is still out as to whether homosexuality is genetic or environmental but it is increasingly thought to have elements of both (report) . So if some homosexuality is environmental, should we be in a hurry to pass laws which condone and encourage the gay lifestyle?

To my mind this throws much doubt over rushing through laws which allow Gay Marriage, Gay adoption/parenting and other legislations gay lobbyists are trying to push through.

According to studies done by La Trobe university the gay population in Australia is 1.6% for men and .6% for women. And yet they seem to have a very loud voice. Let's not get caught up in their hysteria.

Be gay on your own time, your own dollar and in your own space. Don't push it into mine.

Let's recognise a Gay "Union" but not a Gay "Marriage".