Translate

Posts By Topic

Monday, 12 November 2012

Carbon Tax Rort Threatens Australian Food Security.

Gillards Carbon Tax. Another Stuff Up.

I can't believe that any Australian Government would develop a policy with this in mind. So I must believe that Gillard and her merry band of idiots have made yet another monumental blunder in their "shoot from the hip" policy making attempts to keep the "loony left" Greens happy.

Watch the video below and make up your own mind about our mistake riddled government, as they give the greedy financial institutions another leg up at disastrous consequence to the tax payer and at absolutely no benefit to the environment.


Every major policy that his Government has come up with has been riddled with waste and incompetence.  How long can we remain complacent while this ridiculous excuse for a government digs us deeper into a hole that will take the next government years to dig us out of. 
What will happen when the mining boom is over? It's starting to come off now. Gillard and Swan will have nothing to hang their hat on then and it will be too late. We will be in dire straits and we won't even be able to feed ourselves, because they would have sent our farmers broke and sold of the farm to foreign investors.
A Federal election cannot come soon enough.  

Thursday, 18 October 2012

David Hicks .. The Last Laugh For A Low life.

How do you clear the name of a proven Terrorist?

Hicks caught fighting for Taliban
Here is a grub that in January 2002 was captured fighting alongside the Taliban in Afghanistan. And now that there is a sniff of a loop hole in the law that sent him to Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba, he and his greedy family and lawyers are lining up at the prospect of compensation.
Before anyone starts bull shitting on about human rights and "fair go". David Hicks was fighting for a cause that is notorious for stripping people of their human rights. How ironic then that he now wants his. Are you kidding me?
Let's just study this grub a little closer.
When he was caught he was fighting alongside the deranged murderers, The Taliban, against American soldiers who were attempting to bring to justice the lunatics who were responsible for the September 11 2001 attack on The World Trade Centre in New York which killed almost 3000 Innocent civilians.
"I'm Proud of you son"
He was 26 years old so presumably knew what he was doing. Before taking up this wonderful cause he had been a high school drop out, a car thief, a drug addict, a mercenary soldier in Kosovo and a graduate of 4 Al Qaeda training camps. What a great credit to his up bringing and his family, who are now supporting him and lining up for the compensation as well.
Hick's father and his lawyer are on television each night sprouting crap about "clearing his name".  How can his name be cleared? He was there, caught red handed, an Australian citizen giving "material support to terrorism" This low life should have been shot on the battlefield, then we wouldn't have to be going through this multi-million dollar bullshit and wasting precious energy on this traitor.
And as for his lawyer's and all of the do-gooder human rights wankers. If they are so keen to fight for human rights, why not pick a cause like the 14 year old girl who was shot in the head by Hicks' mates for wanting her human rights. Maybe David could give some of his money to her family.

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Wine Price Rise On The Way.

Pricing Casks Out Of The Market
Yet another Bullshit Tax.
Here we go again. The wowzers give the Government a chance to smash the low income earners with another tax to help their empty coffers. And they will take it, you can bet on that.
The Australian National Preventative Health Agency has advised the Federal Government that the only way to stop people harming themselves by abusing alcohol is to raise the price of cask wine to a minimum of $52 for 4 litres and $9.75 for the cheapest bottle. You can only guess what that will mean for you favourite tipple. And this is all because approximately .15% of the population die each year due to alcohol abuse and 3.7% end up in hospital. Leaving the other 96% of us to pay the extra tax.
That's like punishing a school full of good kids because a couple of them misbehaved.

High End Drunks, No Cheap Wine Here.
This agency tells them that bottled water is dearer than cheap wine, it might interest them to know that it is dearer than petrol as well. Doesn't that just mean that bottled water is a rip off?

Remember when the Rudd Government increased the tax on premixed drinks? (Rum & Cola, Vodka & Lemon etc.) without consulting the industry or, in fact anyone who knew anything about the purchasing habits of drinkers. This was advised by the same agency, and look how well it worked. The young drinkers just replaced premix, which had an average measurable 4.5% alcohol per volume in each serve, for full strength bottle spirits which they mixed themselves at who knows what levels. And increasingly they have reverted to cheap wine straight from the casks at between 12 and 18% Alcohol per volume. Good work you idiots.

They will drink anything to get drunk.
Don't they understand that people who regularly get smashed on alcohol and drugs don't give a rats arse if the price goes up, or what they drink. The price of hard drugs is astronomical, and yet the people who are bent on abusing them will do anything to get the money as we well know. Price does not stop them.

The people who will suffer are the low income earners and pensioners who enjoy their tipple which is usually  a product from the very end of the market that these geniuses want to attack. All because 4 % of the population have no self control and will find other product to destroy themselves with anyway. Perhaps there will be a return to the Metho in the paper bag days straight from Woollies. Or People will increasingly make their own alcohol. It's not hard you know.

Pensioners will suffer
We currently have the highest alcohol prices and the strictest alcohol distribution rules in Western society and our problems, if you believe the Wowzers, are among the worst. Does this tell you something? Price doesn't help anything it is just a money grab.

Do the hard yards and attack the real problems front on. Identify the 4% and work on them. Close night clubs earlier, coral the trouble makers, you know where they are. 
While you play around at politics treating us all like idiots, the real problem gets worse.     

Friday, 28 September 2012

Joey Johns .. New Rugby League Immortal.

Was Joey a biased choice?

Is it just me or does anyone else see an overwhelming number of NSW ex players and supporters on the judging panel for Rugby League's Immortals? And there is a few that hardly or never played the game.

I'm not saying that Joey doesn't deserve to be an immortal because he certainly does, but let's at least wait until his footy boots have had time to air. The decision last night smacks of a desperate need to give NSW fans something to grasp onto after this years loss to Queensland for the seventh year in a row.

I think choosing Mal Meninga was a no-brainer at this time. His record in representative areas of the game easily eclipse Johns' records, and his club records at least rival those of the great half back. Then take into account his record as Queensland Coach and it is easily seen that he has definitely contributed more to our great game on and off the field than Joey, and will definitively enhance the ranks of the immortals when they finally induct him.

If any one should be there, Mal Meninga is a rugby league immortal of great stature on all levels. Can anyone enlighten me as to why Andrew John's preceded Mal Meninga into the Immortal ranks? I would be very interested to here a valid reason. Please comment as I am perplexed.

It's a pity that politics should afflict this greatest of all rugby league honours.         

Sunday, 16 September 2012

Muslim Violence .. What Is Wrong With These People

A Movie Is Freedom Of Speech As Well.

Can Islam really be the religion of love and tolerance that their so called moderate members profess it to be?
Just take a look at some of the photos accompanying this commentary and decide for yourself.

I would suggest that some of these women and children see themselves as moderate people following a loving god, however their actions would suggest some thing quite different.

What follower of a loving god would take their children to a violent rally holding a sign demanding the beheading of anyone who speaks out against Islam?
Have a look around the world at every trouble spot and ask yourself what they all have in common .. The answer is evident .. The Muslim religion.
The Muslims in the Sydney riots demand to be able to spit their filth and hatred under the right of freedom of speech, and yet the very film that they are rioting about was produced and shown under those same rights. Whether you like the film or not or whether on not you agree with the depiction of their prophet, there is no excuse for violence and murder.

Why is it that I hear Muslim spokes people condemn the actions of the rioters on one hand, and then explain that they are misunderstood on the other. Like they are naughty children and that some how we bring this all on ourselves for not understanding their culture.
Well I have a good suggestion, If they don't understand Our culture in Our country, why don't they pack up their Australian born children and followers and practise Their culture in  Their countries. 
They burn flags and riot in the streets and expect to be protected by the same laws that they disrespect. Who in hell do they think they are.

We are asked to be respectful of their beliefs and yet they have no tolerance of other religions.

When you see small children participating in these atrocities with their parents consent, we can only guess what they are being taught at home and in their schools. We can only presume that they are being taught that all non-Muslims are scum and that they are all bad people destined for hell, as their protest signs suggest.
Do we want these people in our country? We have nothing of virtue to learn from them and they sure as hell do not want to live like average Australians.
Why would we want to allow our way of life to change so radically as to accommodate these violent and unreasonable people.
I for one will no longer listen to the cries of Australian Muslims when they bleat about persecution. If you want to live here clean up your act and clean out your closet. Report and hound out your radicals, improve your image, live in peace and tolerance, teach your children love and respect for others.

Become Australian.
    

Saturday, 15 September 2012

Incompetent Referees Decide NRL Finals

Gallant Cowboys Robbed Of Prelim Finals Shot. 

What a joke the wonderful game of Rugby League has become in Australia. I don't know whether it is because some officials are on the take, if they are too stupid to see what is in front of them, if their bias toward NSW based teams is clouding their judgement or if our current rules of the game are just to complex for them to grasp.
All of the above possibilities crossed my mind as I watched with anger and alarm as the six game officials (Two video reffs, two linesman and two field reffs) conspired in their incompetence to deny The Cowboys a fair shot at the finals.
It started in the first few minutes of the game when a Manly player duped a gullible Shane Hayne into believing a cowboys player was in the tackle too long. The Manly player had purposely entangled his legs around the marker to milk the penalty. It worked, and as a result of the march down field, Manly scored their first try. I thought then "This guy will favour Manly all night." It is the way it turned out.
Then Clark and Simpkins up in the box, with input from Hayne with his "I think there was momentum" comment into his mic, got it totally wrong in awarding Jorge Taufua a try for placing the ball short of the line and then creating a double movement to place the ball over the line.There was no momentum and any person with half an ounce of knowledge about the game could not give the try. Even the normally NSW biased Channel Nine commentators agreed it should not have been a try.
And then the howler of all howlers. After viewing the replay from all angles, all of which showed clearly that Kiren Foran hit the ball forward from Johnathan Thurston's hands, these bumbling idiots managed to award a try to Michael Oldfield from a clear knock on. Not only I, but everyone else who saw the game, were totally dumb founded.
It went on all night with players allow to continue to play on after clearly knocking on or at least grounding the ball in the in goal. The mistake's are too numerous to mention.
There was one small incident that Manly supporters will say favoured The Cowboys and that is when Ashley Graham knocked the ball from Taufua's hands as he tried to play the ball. However this happens many times in a game and the rule of thumb has always been "Poor Ball Security". Another contentious rule that should be fixed. It's easy, enforce the rules consistently.
As I always say, "If you are going to winge, then provide a solution." Here are mine.
If it is difficult to attract talented people (Ex Players preferably) to the refereeing ranks, pay more money, then fine them severely when they get it wrong. Money always talks.
I hear people like Gus Gould wanting to get rid of technology for decision making. I say embrace it and perfect it to help with all decisions. If 6 reffs can't get it right, take it out of their hands.
  

Saturday, 14 July 2012

John Steffensen's Rant.

John Steffensen or Anthony Mundine? .. I can't tell the difference.

Report - News.com.au

He we go again, it's all about colour with these blokes. When they just don't quite cut it and miss out on the team, it's all about race. .. "They didn't pick me because of the colour of my skin."
Steffensen's rant on channel nine this morning sounded just like Mundine's when he failed to make the Australian rugby league side. "It would be a different story if I was white."
Please.. you just weren't good enough guys. Both great athletes and near the top in your fields, but there is someone just that little bit better. Live with it.
Cathy Freeman, Johnathan Thurston, Sam Thaiday, Gordon Tallis, Mal Meninga, just to name a few in the same arenas, didn't seem to have a race problem when representing their country.
I think you'll find guys, that if there are any underlying reasons, other than your ability, for your failure to reach certain heights (which I'm sure there is not), it may have something to do with the giant chips on your shoulders and your mouthy attitudes. There's and old saying .. "You'll catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar"

The afore mentioned superstars are universally loved by their fellow Australians, where as you guys seem to have a slight popularity problem. As an avid sports fan and a past competitor, I can guarantee you it has nothing to do with colour.

In the case of Steffensen, who keeps quoting rules and assuring us that he is a stickler for them. The rules allow Australia to have one spot in the individual 400 metres. I would imagine that this is to allow us to enter someone at our discretion if we believe that it is worth while, either with a chance of reaching the finals or with a view to experience for someone who has the potential to become an Olympic champion.
Now that would not be John Steffensen, he has had his day in the sun. But it is Steve Solomon.

There are those, such as former Olympian David Culbert, who believes that Solomon could become the best 400m runner in the world and at lease be a factor this year in London.

29 year old Steffensen has struggled with an injury hampered Olympic preparation this year where as Solomon ran a personal best time in Barcelona yesterday .22 of a second off an Olympic A standard time. 

With this in mind, Athletics Australia would have been fools to take Steffensen just to make up the numbers and prove they are not rasicist. Young Solomon deserves the chance and Steffensens support.   

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Refugee Crisis ... Another Labour Stuff-Up


Lefty Journos lay refugee stuff-up at Libs feet. .. Uuhh?


In light of the recent tragedies unfolding around Christmas Island, just about every news bulletin at the moment seems to be laying the blame for Australia's ongoing refugee fiasco at the feet of the Liberal opposition. Howling that Abbott should bow to Gillard's wishes and give in to the Malaysian Solution... I don't understand. Isn't that solution bad for refugees?
Let's put some facts on the table and scrape away some of the bullshit.

When Labour came to power they threw out a perfectly sound package of Liberal policies that had stopped people smuggling in its tracks. They did this purely for political reasons.

Labours bleeding heart policies allowed people smugglers to get back to business with a very saleable package. Allowing people (Not necessarily refugees) to jump the queue, at great expense and considerable danger, to catch leaky boats to Australia. While the genuine and poorer refugees waited in line behind the queue jumpers. 

Very quickly a trickle of boats grows to a flood, as more and more people smugglers become involved in this very lucrative trade. (Getting paid even though some of their customers were lost at sea). Until we have an ever increasing boarder protection mess.

Gillard stabs Rudd in the back and scrapes into power with the support of the Greens and a gaggle of independents.

The refugee problem gets that bad that Labour must now rethink their failed policies, and after a couple of botched attempts (Onshore processing, the Timor solution and other pie in the sky suggestions.) They finally decide on the Malaysian Solution. Anything to avoid admitting they were wrong in the first place.

The Malaysian Solution then runs into problems, not least of all with our human rights laws. With some comparing the treatment of refugees in Malaysia to our live cattle export problems. (An exaggeration of course, but you get the drift.)

Now everyone opposes the Malaysian Solution, Australian Law, Labours allies in government (The Greens and Independents) and the Opposition. But does that dissuade Julia?.. Nooo! She wants to legislate to change our human rights laws so that she can exchange 800 asylum seekers with Malaysia for 4000 confirmed refugees. Even if you disregard the lopsided numbers in this "deal", what will happen to the poor 800 people who would be shoved off to Malaysia without human rights assurances? 

So now that her allies in government have refused to back her halfwit plan to change our human rights laws so that she might have a political win. She suddenly turns the blame for the failure of  her ill conceived plan on the Opposition.

But if that is not bizarre enough, the labour leaning Journos of this country, instead of questioning the incompetence of the Government and the lack of support of their Green and Independent allies, decide that it is the Opposition that is at fault. No matter that the policies that they stand by have already proved successful. 

And now that the Opposition has suggested a compromise on the basis of common ground. I.E. voting to make secure law for off shore processing in all countries that are signatories to the UN refugee charter. They are still portrayed as the bad guys because they won't include Malaysia in the compromise. But as I asked before...Isn't that deal bad for refugees? 

My questions are, in light of the failure of just about every major policy the current Government has presided over, including during their time under Rudd. 

Would you sign off on a totally untested scheme which, on the surface, condemns asylum seekers to uncertain human rights in Malaysia? 

Why isn't the popular media pressuring the elected government (Including the Greens and independents) for compromise? Considering that they don't want to back flip to policies that worked.

Why can't that band of happy little Vegemites (Labour, Greens, and Independents) sit down and thrash out a solution? After all they're supposed to be allies and have the numbers in government.

Why is it the fault of the opposition that the elected government can't swallow their pride and go back to the proven solutions of the Howard Government?

Please, it's the greatest failed government since the Whitlam era. This is yet another disaster by a government that lurches from bad policy to bad policy, all made for political reasons more than for the good of Australians.

Saturday, 2 June 2012

Julian Assange .. Hero or Hypocrite?

Did he go too far in his quest for recognition?

From a nuisance computer hacker, some would say a thief of intellectual property, to an internationally renowned exposer of stolen secrets and alleged sexual molester. 
It seems that for most of his life Assange has been taking something that doesn't belong to him and using it for his own benefit no matter the consequences to other people.
His comparatively small following of supporters think he is a hero and like many other so called "Do-gooders" have no regard for what the rest of the world may think, or how their action may affect us and, dare I say, them in the future.
There is no doubt that some of the atrocities which Wikileaks exposed were in the public interest. However some of the US diplomatic cables which he exposed, put in jeopardy the very laws and security under which he has the good fortune to live.

We live in a world today with enemies who prey on the very freedoms our democracies provide. They sneak around hiding behind women, children and religion always looking for a chance to strike at our soft underbelly, and increasingly the men and women who protect our lives and our way of life, have to rely on secret intelligence to keep one step ahead of these lunatics and fanatics. They have to gather this intelligence in ever increasingly covert ways so that it continues to flow from genuine sources, and when these sources are exposed, our enemies win the a fight in this dangerous new war. We don't need self righteous brats like Julian Assange and his group of left wing fanatics batting for the other side.

If they wish to play at investigative journalism, they would do well to work for the goodies. Do some hard yards and expose the secrets of the baddies who want to harm us and our way of life, not of those who are trying to protect us. If they want to create a free and open world as they say, start at the difficult end where human rights are violated every day and political murder is a common occurrence. Put yourself in danger, not others.

Use the technology for something that benefits the world at large, not the mongrels out there. The rules of engagement are not black and white these days, sometimes we have to fight in the shadows. 

Now people are digging into your secrets Julian... How does it feel?

Who's Running The NRL?

Freddy Fittler Gets On The Red Phone To Gallop!

Well we have a brand new Commission to run the NRL now but nothing seems to have changed. NSW and the NSW oriented Channel Nine commentary team are still in charge. 
NSW loses the first State of Origin match and Freddy is straight on the phone to Gallop, with a couple of disgruntled refs in tow to demand the head refs sacking.... (Is that you with your hand up the back of Freddy's shirt Gus?).

Bill Harrigan best ref.
Bill Harrigan was arguably the best ref the game has seen with daylight second. He made the blokes running around today in the NRL look like rank amateurs, even though there are almost twice as many of them officiating at each match.
I hear that their main gripes are that he didn't watch the refs officiate at the recent Australia V New Zealand test or at the City V Country Match. Most decisions on their performance would be made after studying the tapes anyway wouldn't they? I think the whinge is more likely to be "Why didn't I get a gig at the first state of origin?"

Paul Kent from the Telegraph, in his biased article on the 31st May (Not a renowned Referee), suggests that Russell Smith or Tony Archer might replace him. Pleaseee! lets run through their litany of mistakes over the years, both on the field and in the box.
And enough of this nonsense about "great refs don't always make great coaches". How about "your only as good as the cattle you've got".
We all know that at the heart of the matter is the Inglis try decision. Please, lets be honest, Farah deliberately kicked at the ball and in your wildest imagination you cannot say the Inglis played at it when it hit his forearm. So it was a try. And as I mentioned in a previous article, examine Uate's first try and you can find a knock on by him if you look hard enough.
I guess the only way to please the NSW sooks would be to put Gus and Freddy in the third refs box next game. Or perhaps they could let the broadcast go to the third ref like the old days. That way he could hear all of the biased commentary. 

Here's the thing. If you keep changing the team (or "officials") every time you lose, you might keep on losing. You'd think the NSW boy's would have caught on to that by now.

Leave Hollywood alone, he'd be a tremendous loss to the game. I'm not sure that his persecutors would be.   
  

Sunday, 27 May 2012

NSW SOUR GRAPES!!

How state bias affects the eye site... and the call of the game.

Because the television coverage of State Of Origin rugby league is dominated by NSW biased commentators, the major topic of conversation since the final siren has been the Greg Inglis try. The rules state that when Farah struck at the ball with his foot to dislodge it from Inglis' hands, Inglis did not play at it when it struck him on the forearm, it was a rebound.This created a whole new play and Inglis was able to place the ball for a legitimate try. So boys, the rules of the game, as they stand, state that it was clearly a try; so suck it up and get over it.

Now lets talk about the incident much earlier in the game that Gus (Gus Gould)and Rabbs (Ray Warren) and the rest of the NSW whiners don't want to mention, and skipped over without as much as a backwards glance on the night.
The incident to which I refer is when Akuila Uate clearly knocked the ball on into Darius Boyd then regathered to score his try. 
If you study the replay, he actually touches it twice. Once into Boyd's arms then again when he attempts to bat it toward his players. ... No Try ... So boys, the score is actually 18 - 6.
Now did I see it that way because I am looking at it through Queensland coloured eye site? .. Perhaps.
Anyway, look at the score board all of you NSW whiners.
See you in Sydney! .... Bring your hankies.  


Sunday, 20 May 2012

Musgrave Park Embassy? ... Fair Dinkum

Sam Watson and his mates have gone to the CMC to file official complaints against the Queensland Premier, The Brisbane Lord Mayor, The Qld. Police Minister and The Qld. Police Commissioner. They want to know who instigated the police action to remove activists from the Musgrave Park Tent Embassy last week and how much it costs.
While they are at it, I'd like them to find out who pays Sam Watson's wages, his Plane fair up from Sydney, how much the investigation is going to cost and who is going to pay for this frivilous complaint. I think we all know the answer to that. The hand that feeds the activists will pay... The genuine Tax Payer.

They say the police were heavy handed. Well if you don't move when you are told, you should be dragged away. What did they think would happen? Did they think the Police would just go away once the activists said they weren't moving.

To avoid trouble, as it was a week day, the Police should have waited until the "Embassy" habitants had left for work to pull down the camp. Oh! wait a minute, I forgot, they don't work. The community pays them to sit around and cause trouble.

Embassy indeed. It's just an excuse for a bunch of lay abouts to set up camp in the middle of the city. What possible good are they doing anyone, except giving themselves somewhere have a camping holiday. They have as much right to camp in a public park as any Australian in my view. That is none.

I don't except that they have rights to the land. If you go back far enough, their ancestors were invaders as much as anyone, in the same way that people all over the world now occupy land. The early tribes of 50,000 years ago or more, came to Australia across land bridges during the last ice age from diverse land masses, such as today's Indonesia, New Guinea and around from Africa and India, taking thousands of years. They all fought each other for possession of the land and rescorces. Click here to Reference ....Who was here first? .. Read Stang's View 29.01.12.

Move them out permanantly.They can go to work like anyone else or contribute something productive to this country. Help build a future ... don't live on a past that is built on politically correct myth.

Saturday, 12 May 2012

NRL Still Run By NSW


NRL Judiciary ... Here we go again.

Well it must be said, one rule for New South Wales and another rule for Queensland.
How does Paul Gallen get off Scott free after kneeing a player in the head?
Regardless of the fact that no one was hurt, the intention was there. He lifted his knee into Dave Taylor's head, not just once I might add, with the express purpose of slowing down the play... It was not an accident!
When a player runs at a half back as he is kicking the ball and arrives a split second late and knocks him over, he is penalised and most of the time put on report. Because the action was not an accident.
If a player hangs out his arm as an attacking player steps inside him and hits him around the head, the contact, although careless, was still intentional and the offending player is penalised, put on report and usually suspended.
And when a player makes contact with another player's head with his knee, most of the time he is penalised and put on report and usually suspended for two to three weeks.
Unless of course you happen to be the NSW Captain.
Why don't we just have a rule that says. If you get a suspension leading up to representative games, your suspension commences when you return to club football.
This would probably help to stop the double standards.
Go The Maroons!!

Friday, 6 April 2012

Crackdown On Union Logos.

The Eureka Flag Does A Back Flip.

The Victorian Government has moved to ban union logos and insignia that imply compulsory union membership from government work sites. These rules will apply in the Baillieu Government's new code of conduct for all government funded construction sites. Source - The Age

A good idea in my book. One symbol used extensively by militant self-serving unions, the Eureka Flag, really sticks in my craw.
Who are the CMFEU and the BLF to claim this iconic flag as their own? Surely this flag belongs to every Australian, not just a group of bullies, shoving people around to line their own pockets.
I understand the line they are trying to draw. I.E. the poor, down trodden masses rebelling against unjust authority. However this does not quite fit the picture these days and young Australians seeing that flag today, flying from a crane on an inner-city construction site, would be associating it with a totally wrong set of values.

The Eureka Stockade had nothing to do with unions and militants grabbing a bigger slice of the pie and trying to rule the construction industry. It was all about a group of self employed miners in the 1800s mining boom, objecting to being taxed (By way of a Miners Licence) by the colonial government, to dig precious minerals from our sovereign soil (Gold). Source - Wikipedia

Now doesn't that seem a little ironic? The Julia Gillard Government (AKA The Unions), is imposing a giant new tax on today's self employed miners to take precious metals from our sovereign soil and the Eureka Flag waving unions are supporting her all the way, so that they can get their share of the 2000s mining boom. Doesn't that mean that they jumped the fence?

The Eureka Miners would be turning in their graves.


Monday, 5 March 2012

Wayne Swan .... The Great Pretender.

I think anyone with half a grasp of what is happening in the world economy and Australia's position in it, if they are honest with themselves, would agree that there are two main reasons for our enviable situation compared to most other economies.
1. When the Labor Government came to power, the previous Liberal Government had built up a substantial "Rainy Day" fund to cushion us from just such things as a the WFC.
2. The fortunate abundance of natural resources we have. Allowing us to take advantage of Asia's, and in particular, China's hunger for these products, as they emerge as a new world economic giant. (And buy up half of our country. But that adds to the coffers too doesn't it Wayne?)
However, there are clouds on the horizon, as these emerging economies falter and the WFC continues to bite and devastate the economies of some of their largest customers. In Europe and The US.
There are already calls from major economic experts for us to urgently build our "Rainy Day" fund back up, because they believe we are on the brink of another world financial disaster. However there seems little evidence of this from our Government.
They seem to want to make it more difficult for our miners to compete on the world stage with the mining tax, and to drive our local manufacturers into the ground with a carbon tax and their failure to manage our high dollar properly. Whilst at the same time allowing the instigators of the WFC, the Banks, to continue on their merry way, fleecing the man in the street to ensure record profits each quarter.
The Worlds Greatest Treasurer indeed, what rot.
Our envied position in the world economy has been none of his doing. When you look at the continued waste that Swan, Gillard and Rudd have presided over these long five years, it has been dumb luck and our resources boom that have kept them afloat.
Never mind, when our luck runs out and we end up in the gurgler with everyone else, we will vote for the Libs and they will play the bad parent again and pull us out of the mire. It's a cycle, The Libs prudently save up until we think we need a change, then we vote for Labor and they buy us all a new TV, School Hall, Insulation Bats and a brand new Broadband connection, Oh! and how's that Education Revolution going Julia?
I know, it's all nation building, but all of the people struggling to pay the rent don't really get it.

Monday, 6 February 2012

Parasitic Banks .... Robbing The Poor To Give To The Rich

Australian Banks, after being propped up by the Australian tax payer during the GFC (and probably will be looking for our support again if, as many economists believe, round two hits the global economy in the near future), are now back to their old tricks. They use every trick in the financial book to grab more money from the people who can least afford it, simply because we can't do anything about it. Mr. (Toothless) Swan tells us to shop around and shift banks, but they are all dealing from the same deck. It's the shareholders that count, stuff the customers. Increasingly, the best way to make money from a bank, is to buy their shares, but not everyone can afford to do this.
That other toothless institution, the ACCC, says that they can't find evidence of collusion, but the banks don't need to collude, they pay agencies to do it for them. Data is collected on a weekly, and sometimes daily, basis and fed to them instantly via the Internet, on all of their competitors charges and fees. (Coles and Woolworths do this as well with grocery and petrol pricing) They don't object to this information merry-go-round, in fact they encourage it. Now they don't have to bother picking up the phone to their mates across town.
They are currently running a subtle campaign to grease our wheels before the next interest rate cut by the reserve bank, because they intend to pass very little, if any, of it on to their customers.
Their excuse is that their cost of borrowing from overseas is too high because of the GFC.
Let's just look at the facts, firstly they borrow less than one third of their money for lending from overseas, the rest they get from us. (That is if you have enough to save. Have your savings interest rates gone up recently?) and secondly, they have been recording massive, increased profits each quarter as if there isn't and has never been a financial crisis. How does that work? The institutions that caused the crisis are actually making money from it. Wow! What a business.
It makes me sick to my stomach when I see their ads on TV, insulting my intelligence by telling me what kind, caring people they are and how much they care for their customers. What bullshit. They close branches, charge increased fees on everything they can get away with, Throw people out of their homes and businesses as soon as something goes wrong, subtly force everyone into Internet banking (I like Internet banking, but it certainly has saved them a packet), charge exorbitant fees for late payments and overdrawing (Until recently, thanks to a class action which is currently running.) and in the next few months they will be cutting thousands of jobs so that they can maintain their huge profits, and pay their senior executives millions in salaries and bonuses. Meanwhile, when we want to talk to someone on the phone, they will be sitting in a 1 meter square booth in India somewhere with an Indian-English dictionary beside them and access to all of our financial records.
The sorriest thing that ever happened to Australian banking was the privatisation of the Commonwealth Bank. Just imagine if it was still owned by the tax payer; I'm old enough to remember the good old days of no fees, free money boxes, personal service, talking directly to the Bank Manager. If we still owned it and weren't worried about making huge profits for shareholders and bank executives, the Government would certainly have a big stick to keep the other greedy bastards in check. Housing and business finance might be more affordable and understanding, you could leave your savings in the bank and instead of disappearing they would increase, even if you forgot about the account for a while.
It's all very well having a strong banking sector, but I see them as parasites snaking their suckers into every nook and cranny of our lives until we can't do without them, you know, interest free TV's, furniture, white goods, car finance "don't worry about your credit rating". All of these lenders are backed by the banks down the line. Then they strangle us when there is nothing left. We protect them, because if we didn't they would take us all down with them. But while we do that, the most vulnerable, the ones in need of most assistance, are kicked to the curb. Should the banks be allowed to control people's lives and make massive profits as they do it? I think not, I believe our Government needs to have more control, and if competition is the best form of control, let us compete. Bring back the Government owned bank, pay more interest on savings and charge less for borrowing. There are too many people struggling because of what bank systems decide, systems that are geared toward more profits instead of helping customers with their finances after, but particularly before they borrow money. Banks have always fed from other's debt, nothing has changed, and there in lies the problem, it's just getting worse, as shareholders demand more profit the banks push more debt and when people are doing it tough, they'll borrow more. and oops! another GFC, or a continuing one.

Sunday, 29 January 2012

Tent Embassy? .... Please!


I hear Aboriginal activists at the Canberra Tent “Embassy” calling for freedom from bondage, Aboriginal rights and land rights. What’s that all about? I don’t see them in bondage, and I believe they have more rights than I do as a white Australian, and as far as land rights are concerned, again they have more than  Non-Indigenous Australians.  Could someone please show me, in what way do I, as a white Australian, have more rights and freedoms than any other Australian.
Teaching new generations to hate.
What do you think would happen to a group of white hippies if they were to set up camp across the road from Parliament House and light a fire in the middle of summer in Canberra and refused to move? You know what would happen; they would be arrested and carted off to jail, while their camp was destroyed.
What purpose does this “Embassy” serve? The only thing I perceive is that it provides somewhere to sleep for a bunch of lazy, good for nothing bludgers, who have never contributed anything constructive to the plight of their people or the Australian community in general, in their lives.
They cry about wanting sovereignty over Australia, and wanting to be recognised in the constitution as the first Australians. What does that even mean, who were the first Australians?
Archaeologists are still determining who came from where. All they know is that during the last Ice Age people came into Australia from Asia and Islands to the north such as New Guinea and settled here, some believe they have evidence of some tribes coming directly around the rim of the Indian Ocean from Africa. They weren’t one people and they would have claimed land from each other in the age old way, by killing and/or driving or breeding their competitors out, survival of the fittest. Much the same as happened when whites came to Australia.
So why does this bunch of lay-abouts have claim to any of Australia? They have no idea who they were originally descended from, and they’ve never lifted a finger to preserve or improve the country.
Some do-gooders will have you believe that they are “One with the land” and have been preserving it for thousands of generations. What rot. What happened to all of the species of native fauna that flourished here before their arrival but have since disappeared? There were many species such as Australia’s Mega Fauna, giant marsupials that were around until only a few thousand years ago. These original species became food, that’s where they went, and the early tribes contributed greatly to their disappearance.
To help the extinction of native fauna along, they also introduced the dog to Australia which now miraculously has become our native dog the Dingo, much as this mish-mash of ancient Asians has become our native people. There were no dogs here prior to the invasion from the north.
So you see the whole argument is based on myth and fairytales. After the first few arrived from wherever, these many races that arrived in the next few thousand years, by their own definition, would be considered invaders of Australia.
They were not environmental heroes, they were just human beings like the rest of us, who spread out across any land that they came across and used the natural resources for their own survival.
Some super being didn’t plonk them down and make them custodians of the land, they immigrated here like everyone else, and that process continues today. Come back in another 40,000 or even 5,000 years and see what our people look like. Should my ancestors then burn the Australian flag, sit on their arse and demand Sydney Harbour?
All of this land rights rubbish matters not a jot, it takes the focus off the real problems. It is not going to fix the fact that there are more aboriginal people in jails than any other race, or that the mortality rate among our indigenous peoples is greatly higher than other Australians and it’s not going to arrest the abuse of children in remote communities.
With the millions of dollars poured into Indigenous problems every year, every person of Aboriginal decent could be living in a mansion in the lap of luxury, so where we are spending, and the way we are accounting for money is not fixing the problems either.
I would just ask the militants who encouraged their children to spit on and burn the Australian flag on Australia day. What did you achieve besides contributing to the delinquency of those children and greater antagonism toward your people? And I would just like to say to you that if you started to concentrate on the solutions rather than whining about the problems, you might be of some assistance to the many millions of people from all races around Australia, who work tirelessly trying to solve the problems Aboriginal people face.   

Saturday, 21 January 2012

NRL All Stars Match ... Racially divisive?

I'm not a fan of the NRL All Stars match up, a match I see as having racial undertones and driving another small wedge between races in this great country. Yes it will be a great spectacle, with 34 of the best in the game going at it, and yes the gate and the TV ratings will be real money spinners, but at what cost?
We all know how emotionally charged the "Tribal" clashes get during the normal NRL season when only clubs are involved. We see how team affiliations lead to heated rivalries during these clashes, wherever the games are viewed. (You know what I'm talking about you Bulldogs fans). To see a prime example of the enduring hatred generated by sporting rivalries, look no further than State Of Origin.
Now extend that to a National basis with White against Black and imagine the racial slurs and comments, not only at the ground, but right around the country in lounge rooms, pubs and clubs switched into this racial "war".
In this era of reconciliation and trying to close the divide between Indigenous Australians and those of  European extraction, do we need a major sporting event setting black against white? I think not.
People with an opposing view would say that it is great for young Aboriginal and Islander kids to aspire to their hero's status, but can't they do this by watching them during the normal season of club and rep games?
What is the purpose of this game? Other than that misguided point mentioned above, I can see no positives in this clash at all, except perhaps if you count the millions of dollars that the NRL will rake in from people going to the game or tuning in to watch their race smash the other.
Australian soccer had their race problems years ago and now continue to strive to keep racial affiliations out of their clubs.
If we are really trying to promote our Indigenous Australian's achievements and, at the same time draw the races closer together, wouldn't it be better if we had a match that would unite all Australians behind a single side and have the Indigenous All Stars play the Maori All Stars?
Although I love a great game of Rugby League, I won't be tuning in; my protest.

Popular Posts